If you work in HR at a medium sized enterprise (250-5,000 employees), chances are you have received sales outreach from a variety of different HRIS providers.
It can be hard to distinguish one vendor from the next, especially when you already have a busy full-time job.
In this series of blog posts, we're going to provide head-to-head comparisons of leading options in the market. The first comparison we will review is comparing ADP vs UKG, highlighting the differences in each company's pricing, user experience, integration capabilities and more.
Note: In this article when we reference UKG, we are referring to UKG Pro, formerly called UltiPro. When we reference ADP, we are referring to ADP Workforce Now.
- Founded in 1949
- Headquarters in Roseland, NJ
- ~810,000 customers
- ~58,000 employees
- Founded in 1990 (re-branded in 2020)
- Headquarters in Weston, FL
- ~50,000 customers
- ~13,000 employees
Best Front-End Interface
UKG. For a company that has been in business since the early 90s, UKG has done a phenomenal job of keeping their user experience fresh and modern. Their mobile app gets strong reviews from employees for ease of use and the admin experience is also much more intuitive than some of their peers.
Best for Managed Services
ADP. One of ADP's biggest differentiators in the marketplace is their ability to provide outsourced services to businesses that don't want to be trapped managing back office, lower value tasks. ADP's Comprehensive Services model provides outsourced payroll processing, benefits enrollment and compliance management options to businesses
Best for Integrations
Tie. ADP has put quite a bit of work into their integration marketplace over the last decade. They have pre-built API connections with many leading vendors, such as Greenhouse, Lattice and JazzHR. UKG is now starting to build out their integration marketplace and has always had some deep ties with groups like Cornerstone and iCIMS. Even despite all of the recent efforts from both groups, the integration experience with both can still be flawed due to their older product architectures.
Best for Customer Support
UKG. UKG is known for their 'Partners for Life' philosophy where they try to delight their customers and win their business for the long haul. UKG has one of the higher customer retention rates in the industry and, due to the fact that they are often named a Best Workplace, UKG also can retain great customer support people for the long haul.
Best for Payroll
ADP. ADP has incredible depth when it comes to payroll, tax filing and benefits carrier connections. Their background as a payroll bureau gives them the most institutional knowledge in the industry and they process so much payroll that the US government relies on them for unemployment data.
ADP. ADP and UKG are often priced in the mid-to-high range of HRIS options. A full suite system can typically cost businesses anywhere from $20-28 PEPM for ADP and $25-34 for UKG. ADP can often get more aggressive on pricing and typically doesn't charge as much for implementation. UKG does have a more transparent billing model, however.
Best for Talent Management
UKG. While ADP got their start in payroll, UKG has always been about HR. UKG's talent management tools (ATS, surveys, onboarding, compensation) are some of the best you'll find in any HRIS. For companies that are interested in developing and impacting their workforce, UKG is a great fit.
Best for Global Companies
ADP. Both companies can serve as a global system of record. However, ADP owns their own payroll aggregator (Celergo) and has offices around the globe. UKG is starting to be a bigger player internationally, but currently relies on a 3rd party for global payroll and doesn't have as much of a global footprint.
Best for Scalability
UKG. ADP's payroll module can work for companies of all sizes, but when it comes to the full suite HRIS, UKG is the more scalable option. ADP typically works best for companies with 50-750 employees, whereas UKG serves the 500-5,000 space more frequently. UKG has some advanced workflow building tools that can allow for greater automation at scale.